A group statement on SCO's actions

[James Lance]

--Boundary-02=_qdAz+F0x4HMLWeg
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Description: signed data
Content-Disposition: inline

Count me in too.

James

On Wednesday 21 May 2003 4:38 pm, Wade Preston Shearer wrote:

> i'm behind you... with a signature, a statement, whatever you need.
>
> what would you like to do?
>
> -wade
>
> On Wednesday, May 21, 2003, at 04:14  PM, Jayce^ wrote:
> > On Wednesday 21 May 2003 03:54 pm, Steve Roundy wrote:
> >> Do you really think it of any consequence to SCO though?  We really
> >> mean
> >> next to nothing to their success or failure... why should they bother
> >> with what we think?
> >
> > I dont' worry as much about their opinion, they've already showed how
> > they
> > feel towards our community.  Instead I prefer making our case known
> > for the
> > local companies who are looking at linux and seeing this in the news.
> > It's
> > something that might help local people in understanding that there
> > really is
> > a large userbase locally (which many don't know about, and therefore
> > are
> > afraid of linux), and shows our side of the story.  It's more for us,
> > and
> > those looking to adopt linux, for personal, or business use.
> >
> > At least, that's my opinion...
> >
> > --
> > --Jayce^
> > <mime-attachment>
>
> .===================================.
>
> | This has been a P.L.U.G. mailing. |
> |      Don't Fear the Penguin.      |
>
> `==================================='

--Boundary-02=_qdAz+F0x4HMLWeg
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Description: signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQA+zAdqxwWH9N2FUHoRApGZAKDNRhw4rTSAMklB4AOmjO/I2RQmUgCfVNkj
fUic0htw1uYz8o6D6usSOjE=
=zAur
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Boundary-02=_qdAz+F0x4HMLWeg--