A group statement on SCO's actions

[Jayce^]

--Boundary-02=_Ip/y+IsQ4Vm+PvL
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Description: signed data
Content-Disposition: inline

On Wednesday 21 May 2003 03:54 pm, Steve Roundy wrote:
> Do you really think it of any consequence to SCO though?  We really mean
> next to nothing to their success or failure... why should they bother
> with what we think?

I dont' worry as much about their opinion, they've already showed how they=
=20
feel towards our community.  Instead I prefer making our case known for the=
=20
local companies who are looking at linux and seeing this in the news.  It's=
=20
something that might help local people in understanding that there really i=
s=20
a large userbase locally (which many don't know about, and therefore are=20
afraid of linux), and shows our side of the story.  It's more for us, and=20
those looking to adopt linux, for personal, or business use.

At least, that's my opinion...

=2D-=20
=2D-Jayce^

--Boundary-02=_Ip/y+IsQ4Vm+PvL
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Description: signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQA+y/pIA10/0O8cAHgRAiaNAJ0Q1Fp9QPF3cC4qpY1tjWmztFmT5wCgjuFH
TtYzE6mQCkUFEX+cpuqmGFU=
=pmum
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Boundary-02=_Ip/y+IsQ4Vm+PvL--