A group statement on SCO's actions

[Jayce^]

--Boundary-02=_f4+y+9nvQaMJoMg
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Description: signed data
Content-Disposition: inline

On Wednesday 21 May 2003 02:46 pm, Mitch Anderson wrote:
> Personally, I don't really see the need for such a letter... I'm sure
> SCO has seen the reactions from the community.  Its all over every tech
> news feed I've seen.  Why continue what others have already done?  The
> OSI Position Paper I think sums most anything anyone could bring up.
> Regardless I don't think any of it is going to change SCO's mind untill
> the court ruling.

Well, I see some use for it.  It helps show local companies what local peop=
le=20
think.

=46or example, yesterday I was interviewed by the Provo Daily Herald about =
the=20
situation (along with Evan, the BYU-UUG president, and Chris Sonntag of SCO=
)=20
about this whole situation.  Something like that would have been very good =
to=20
provide the reporter with, as he was looking for input from the local peopl=
e=20
affected by this case, and actions.

=2D-=20
=2D-Jayce^

--Boundary-02=_f4+y+9nvQaMJoMg
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Description: signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQA+y+4fA10/0O8cAHgRAkKXAJwKsB4JYyh2fVMpCkPZ9XVJ/Hs2SwCfZ4H6
9EgArncUIeu3tL/A57locdw=
=RQ2S
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Boundary-02=_f4+y+9nvQaMJoMg--